Number of public complaints reported

Complaint categories

Sub-categories

Example

Number of Complaints

2020-21

Professional behaviour

Staff attitude

Failure to demonstrate values such as empathy, respect, fairness, courtesy, extra mile; cultural competency

3

Professional behaviour

Staff competency

Failure to action service request; poorly informed decisions; incorrect or incomplete service provided

15

Communication

Communication quality

Inadequate, delayed or absent communication with customer

35

Service delivery

Systems/technology

System offline; inaccessible to customer; incorrect result/information provided; poor system design

3

Service delivery

Access to services

Service difficult to find; location poor; facilities/ environment poor standard; not accessible to customers with disabilities

2

Service delivery

Process

Processing error; incorrect process used; delay in processing application; process not customer responsive

18

Policy

Policy application

Incorrect policy interpretation; incorrect policy applied; conflicting policy advice given

2

Service quality

Information

Incorrect, incomplete, out dated or inadequate information; not fit for purpose

2

Service quality

Timeliness

Lack of staff punctuality; excessive waiting times (outside of service standard); timelines not met

3

No case to answer

No case to answer

Third party; customer misunderstanding; redirected to another agency; insufficient information to investigate

52

  

Total

135

Additional Metrics

Total

Number of positive feedback comments

3

Number of negative feedback comments

135

Total number of feedback comments

138

% complaints resolved within policy timeframes

71%

The complex nature of some client matters and the requirement to retrieve historical data can have an impact on the ability to respond within policy timeframes. The Public Trustee keeps customers informed if there is likely to be any delay.

Data for previous years is available at: https://data.sa.gov.au/data/organization/attorney-general-s-dept

Service Improvements

The Public Trustee undertakes customer satisfaction surveys each year which provide insight into the main opportunities for improving service delivery. Complaints are also tracked throughout the year to determine common trends and improvement opportunities. The information from each of these sources, along with the initiatives customer service branches have developed to address the trends, is considered at a Customer Experience Committee forum quarterly throughout the year.

Examples of initiatives undertaken during this period include: implementing a new caseload and file allocation model within Personal Estates, implementing a call coaching program for Team Leaders and their staff, monthly file progress reviews with Team Leaders and improved customer contact reporting. These all contributed to improved customer satisfaction outcomes in the 2021 Customer Satisfaction Survey.